Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > The Campfire

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Oct 12, 2006, 05:45 PM // 17:45   #41
dgb
Jungle Guide
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Profession: Mo/Me
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reinfire
Ignoring your obvious sarcasm, I get the feeling that you are holding on too much to non-existend laws for builds in GW. Why would a Warrior be "THE" damage dealer for GW? Its bullshit, a ranger can deal just as much dmg as a warrior, so do all proffessions BTW if wielded correctly. your "Ill throw a guardian if im bored" is rediculous. If you think that a mere guardian can stop a good warrior/ranger/assassin build than you need some more field experience.

Even if this build is flawed, it can still kill someone in a matter of seconds
You fail at Guild Wars. Warriors are the premier DPS profession. I daresay I've got more 'field' experience than you do - I've spent 90% of my Guild Wars time on monk, most of it in PVP and have seen just about every combination so far around thrown up in an atempt to kill me and the team I'm supporting. Rangers do degen. Rangers do disruption. Rangers do garbage DPS.

The build will only kill someone with an absolutely retarded monk backing them up. If you want to feel good about that, sure, feel free. The rest of the competitive world moved on years ago.

It doesn't do decent DPS and it's vulnerable to just about everything a warrior is. What's the point of it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Mad
^ r-spike anyone?
Ranger spike isn't DPS. Rangers are by far the best at spiking at range and are very good at that, it isn't denied. Spiking only warriors still win.

Last edited by dgb; Oct 12, 2006 at 05:48 PM // 17:48..
dgb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2006, 06:12 PM // 18:12   #42
Forge Runner
 
XvArchonvX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: R/
Default

While I do agree that rangers are not better at warriors at dealing damage in most instances and are best suited as disrupters, condition appliers, etc, they can outdamage warriors in the right situation with Barrage. However, this use is restricted to PvE instances with large amounts of tightly grouped enemies.
XvArchonvX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2006, 07:00 PM // 19:00   #43
Perfectly Elocuted
 
SnipiousMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Default

Ranger's use damage like a tool, rather than a philosophy. Warriors were build to deal damage, and unless they are dealing damage they are not being useful. Ranger's on the other hand, while able to spec damage into a build without much effort, have any number of things they can do in any number of situations. One of the reasons the CripShot ranger is such a powerful PvP character, is because of it's versitility. That is where a Ranger shines, not in it's damage output per say... but the fact that they can add damage when it's needed, and adapt when something else is needed.
SnipiousMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:22 AM // 03:22.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("